SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 2 November 1951, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1). On 17 September 1952, he was tried by special court-martial for a charge for failure to go to his appointed place of duty and disobedience of a lawful order. Following pleas of not guilty, the court found him guilty and sentenced him to a BCD, confinement at hard labor for six months, and forfeiture of $55 per month for six months. On 14 February 1953, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD. He served 7 months and 25 days on active duty with 228 days of lost time. On 6 August 1991 and 23 October 2003, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s requests to upgrade his BCD to an honorable discharge. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation; and, the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H and the Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit J. On 28 July 2005 and 26 August 2010, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request for reconsideration of his appeal based on no new relevant evidence to support his requests. On 2 April 2013, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of his appeal to change his BCD to an honorable discharge. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides as evidence personal statements, military records, birth certificate, adoption documents, several character references, and several newspaper articles. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit K. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge based on clemency. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous decisions. Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that basis. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. 2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1991-01020 in Executive Session on 12 February 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1991-01020: Exhibit H. ROP, dated 15 Aug 91, w/Exhibits A through G. Exhibit J. Addendum to ROP, dated 2 Dec 03, w/Exhibit I. Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Apr 13, w/atchs. Panel Chair